In today's fast-moving digital landscape, the way we build software is evolving faster than ever. Just a few years ago, it was hard to imagine building a fully functional application without a dedicated team of professional developers. But by the end of 2024, over 65% of all new apps were created with the help of low-code or no-code development platforms, a dramatic increase from just 25% in 2020, according to Gartner’s Magic Quadrant. With predictions that over 50% of medium and large companies will adopt low-code solutions as part of their core strategy by 2027, the question facing every business leader in 2025 is no longer if you should embrace low-code, but when and how to use it strategically. At NSC Software, we’ve helped clients navigate both traditional and low-code paths to digital success. In this guide, we’ll explore the core differences between low-code and traditional development, break down when each approach makes sense, and introduce the hybrid model that many businesses are adopting for maximum agility and performance.
Software development has evolved rapidly over the last few years. In 2020, only 25% of apps were built using low-code or no-code tools. By the end of 2024, that number surged past 65%, according to Gartner.
This shift isn’t just a passing trend. By 2027, over half of medium and large companies are expected to make low-code platforms a core part of their digital strategy.
With this transformation underway, it’s important to understand the strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases for low-code and traditional development. This guide from NSC Software will help you evaluate both methods—and discover how a hybrid approach might offer the best of both worlds.
Low-code development is a visual approach to building software.
Instead of writing lines of code manually, users can build applications through drag-and-drop interfaces, reusable components, and simple configuration settings. These tools dramatically reduce the amount of manual coding required and make development accessible to non-programmers.
Popular platforms like OutSystems, Microsoft Power Platform, and Salesforce Lightning allow companies to create web and mobile apps with minimal effort—sometimes in just a few days.
Traditional development, on the other hand, involves coding everything from scratch. Developers use languages such as Java, Python, or C# to write detailed, customized logic and interfaces.
This method requires a skilled team—including frontend/backend developers, system architects, and testers—and follows structured steps such as planning, development, QA, and deployment.
The result? A tailor-made solution that gives you full control over features, security, and performance—but also takes more time and resources to build and maintain.
Traditional development is time-consuming. Projects often take weeks or months to complete, especially when multiple features, integrations, and security layers are involved.
Even with agile methodologies, overlapping tasks and coordination across teams slow things down.
Low-code, by contrast, enables rapid development. Since the framework and components are pre-built, developers (or even business users) can launch MVPs or internal tools in a matter of days.
For example, the app SupportLocal was created in just 3 days using a low-code platform—something virtually impossible in a traditional coding environment.
Traditional development comes with higher upfront costs.
You need a full team of developers, designers, testers, and DevOps specialists. There are also costs related to infrastructure setup, security configuration, and long-term maintenance.
Low-code platforms reduce costs by simplifying and accelerating development. A smaller team can build the same application, and built-in tools handle testing, hosting, and updates.
However, low-code does involve recurring licensing fees. Some platforms charge hundreds or thousands of dollars per month, depending on your app’s scale and user base. Over time, these fees can add up.
This is where traditional development has the upper hand.
You can build anything—custom workflows, highly specific features, and scalable systems designed from the ground up. You also have full access to the codebase, which makes optimization, debugging, and integration easier.
Low-code platforms offer speed, but they’re limited by what the platform allows. If your app requires deep integrations, performance tuning, or niche functionality, low-code might fall short.
Additionally, many platforms don’t offer source code access, which can create vendor lock-in and limit long-term flexibility.
Low-code is best suited for:
Internal tools (e.g., dashboards, trackers, automation tools)
MVPs or prototypes that need to be tested quickly
Departments with limited access to IT support
Simple workflows and form-based apps
If your priority is speed, cost-efficiency, and ease of use—especially for non-customer-facing tools—low-code is often the right choice.
It also empowers non-developers (citizen developers) to build solutions, reducing the burden on central IT teams.
Traditional development is essential when your app requires:
Custom UI/UX design
Advanced integrations or backend logic
Strict compliance (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, etc.)
Scalability to millions of users
Real-time processing or performance optimization
For industries like healthcare, banking, or SaaS products, custom coding provides the reliability, control, and performance that low-code tools can’t match.
You can get applications up and running faster. Use low-code to build and deploy an MVP within days. Then, gradually integrate more complex or sensitive features using traditional coding methods.
This phased rollout allows you to test your idea quickly—while still building toward a robust long-term solution.
Low-code is ideal for standardized functionality. But many business apps eventually need deeper customization—whether for performance, integrations, or compliance.
A hybrid approach lets you start simple and scale strategically, combining visual tools with custom code where needed.
Hybrid development allows you to optimize your team. Junior developers or non-technical users can manage low-code components, freeing up experienced engineers to focus on critical features and architecture.
This leads to greater productivity, shorter timelines, and often lower costs across the entire project.
The low-code market is growing at 20% per year and is expected to surpass $80 billion by 2034.
AI is also playing a bigger role in software development. From automated testing to intelligent code suggestions, AI-enhanced low-code platforms are accelerating development cycles and reducing human error.
Meanwhile, the rise of citizen developers is transforming the workplace. Employees outside IT can now build tools to solve their own workflow challenges—driving innovation from within.
Still, traditional development isn’t going away. For mission-critical apps, complex systems, and industry-specific requirements, manual coding remains essential.
Low-code vs. traditional development doesn’t have to be an either-or decision. The best choice depends on your business goals, technical complexity, available resources, and future plans.
At NSC Software, we help businesses assess their needs and choose the most effective path forward. Whether you're building a simple tool, a fully custom product, or a hybrid system—we’ll help you design, develop, and deploy faster and smarter.
👉 Book your free consultation today.
Let’s build software that moves your business forward.
This website uses functional cookies.